Dear Laboratory Medicine fellows of Asia Pacific,
To show the clinical significance of laboratory medicine and encourage all the laboratory professionals in the Asia-Pacific region to pay more attention to special cases in routine work, the "APFCB Laboratory Medicine Case Contest", organized by APFCB (the Asia Pacific Federation for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine) and Mindray is starting in August. This event is themed "Value of Laboratory Medicine: Resolve Clinical Challenges ". The winning cases will be presented online and discussed by the case review committee. We welcome submissions from a range of perspectives by laboratory professionals.
APFCB (the Asia Pacific Federation for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine)
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd
Chair:?Dr. Tony Badrick (President of APFCB)
Executive Chair: Prof. Cui Wei (Chair of the APFCB Education Committee)
Case review Committee: APFCB and Representatives of member societies
The contest is limited to Asia-Pacific region but open to all laboratory professionals, no matter technicians, pathologists, or doctors.
The overall process of the contest is composed of three parts. The first round is only a written case report, the second round is a video case presentation. And the third round is an online presentation and Q&A.
?
Please submit your written case in a Word document (in English). You must send your case by email to [email protected] before Sep 30. The email should come in a subject that reads: country+name of the case + name of the participant.
?
The scoring criteria are defined as follows:
Item | Scoring Criteria | Total Score |
---|---|---|
Topic and content | Extent to which the topic is clearly defined (e.g., communication between laboratory and clinical department, experience sharing, new technologies and new applications, etc.); extent to which the content is closely relevant to the topic. | 40 |
Scientificity and practicability | How novel the content is; how typical, representative and clinically instructive the case is. | 35 |
Originality and correctness | Extent to which the case is investigated from a creative perspective; how innovative the content is; presence of obvious logical errors. | 25 |
No more than 50 written cases will be selected for the second round.
Participants who are selected for the second round should present their case in a 6 to 8-minute long video. The video should be sent by email to: [email protected] before Nov 10. The email should come in a subject that reads: country+name of the case + name of the participant.
?
The scoring criteria are defined as follows:
Item | Scoring Criteria | Total Score |
---|---|---|
Score from first round | Score from first round x 50% | 50 |
Video presentation | The level of verbal fluency, self-confidence, logicality, and correctness in presentation | 50 |
10 of the 50 winners will be selected and enrolled in the online finals.
For 10 winners from the second round, each of them will have 10 minutes to play a video, 5 minutes for Q&A and scoring. The total time for each winner is limited to15 minutes. The overall time of online competition and award ceremony should be within 3 hours.
?
Date | Agenda |
---|---|
Aug 28 | Launch of the event |
Aug 28 - Sep 30 | Call for cases and submission of written entries |
Sep 30 - Oct 15 | Evaluation of entries in first round (expert review) |
Oct 15 - Nov 10 | Call for cases and submission of video entries (participants enter the Second round) |
Nov 10 - Dec 15 | Evaluation of entries in second round (expert review) | Dec 15 | Final Round and Award Ceremony |
Award | Award Criteria | Number of Winners |
---|---|---|
First Prize | Ranking 1 to 2 by individual score | 2 |
Second Prize | Ranking 3 to 5 by individual score | 3 |
Third Prize | Ranking 6 to 10 by individual score | 5 |
Excellence Award | Participants who entered the second round |